The Gleason score obtained on prostatic biopsies is an essential element in
the treatment decision for localized prostate cancel: The objective of thi
s study was To evaluate the correlation between the biopsy Gleason score an
d the definitive Gleason score and ro propose a classification into 3 group
s in order to improve this correlation.
Material and Methods :One hundred radical prostatectomies were performed be
tween 1995 and 1998. Eighty four of these patients underwent 6 biopsies. Th
e Gleason score of the biopsies and operative specimens were compared. The
concordance between the biopsy Gleason score and the operative specimen Gle
ason score was initially analysed score by score. The concordance was then
established according to three groups, well differentiated tumours (score 2
-4), moderately differentiated rumours (score 5-7), poorly differentiated t
umours (score 8-10).
Results : The concordance between the biopsy Gleason score and the operativ
e specimen Gleason score was perfect in only 37% of cases. A 1-point differ
ence of the score was observed in 35. 7% of cases and a 2-point or greater
difference was observed in 27.3% of cases. By classifying patients into 3 g
roups, the concordance increased from 37% ro 72.6%.
Conclusion : The classification of patients into three distinct groups (wel
l, moderately and poorly differentiated tumours) increases the concordance
between the biopsy Gleason score and the definitive Gleason score. However,
the limitations of the biopsy Gleason score must be kept in mind, particul
arly in the case of low-grade tumours.