Ureterovesical reimplantation after failure of endoscopic treatment of reflux: anatomical and histological study of 61 resection specimens in 40 children
C. Bertschy et al., Ureterovesical reimplantation after failure of endoscopic treatment of reflux: anatomical and histological study of 61 resection specimens in 40 children, PROG UROL, 11(1), 2001, pp. 113-118
Objective: To evaluate the anatomy and histology of the ureterovesical junc
tion resected during secondary surgical reimplantation for persistent reflu
x after failure of initial endoscopic treatment by polytetrafluoroethylene
(Teflon (R)) in 27 cases and polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique (R)) in 1
3 cases.
Material and Method: 61 ureterovesical junctions from 40 children were stud
ied histologically. The mean age of the patients at the time of the operati
on was 4.1 years (range: 1 to IS years). The mean interval between endoscop
ic injection and surgical reimplantation was 15.3 months (range: 2 to 54 mo
nths).
Results: Persistent reflux was nor correlated with the anatomical situation
of the implant, which was found to be in a satisfactory position in 52.4%
of cases. Both of the substances used induced a giant-cell macrophage react
ion which colonized the implant and triggered new vessel formation. Macropl
astique (R) appeared to be associated with a more intense inflammatory reac
tion than Teflon (R).
Despite the difference in particle size, the two substances induced a macro
phage phenomenon characterized by microfragmentation into 6 micron particle
s. No conclusions can be drawn concerning distant migration, but this study
showed rarefaction of particles which were replaced by fibrosis, the densi
ty of which was correlated with the age of the implant.
Conclusion: Extinction of the local reaction induced by the products used i
n this study appears to be long and the end of this process is unknown, whi
ch justifies prolonged surveillance of children treated for reflux by endos
copic submeatal injection.