It is becoming a standard practice for governments to require mining operat
ions to post reclamation bonds. Yet, there have been few theoretical treatm
ents examining the rationale for bonding mechanisms, and even fewer empiric
al treatments of the effectiveness of bonding. This paper addresses some of
these holes in the literature. It begins by examining the rationale underl
ying reclamation bends, and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of bondi
ng as a tool for enforcing reclamation requirements. The role of bonding me
chanisms is to help enforce standards, not necessarily yield efficient outc
omes, and these mechanisms are best viewed as a complement to - not a subst
itute for - liability rules. The paper also examines the effectiveness of b
onding by drawing on evidence from hardrock mining on public lands in the w
estern United States. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.