An evaluation of methodologies for the generation of stochastic hydraulic conductivity fields in highly heterogeneous aquifers

Citation
El. Gego et al., An evaluation of methodologies for the generation of stochastic hydraulic conductivity fields in highly heterogeneous aquifers, STOCH ENV R, 15(1), 2001, pp. 47-64
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Environmental Engineering & Energy
Journal title
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT
ISSN journal
14363240 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
47 - 64
Database
ISI
SICI code
1436-3240(200103)15:1<47:AEOMFT>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Stochastic techniques, such as Monte Carlo experiments, are more and more f requently used for the study of flow and transport in heterogeneous aquifer s. When the aquifer is composed of distinct hydrofacies, a common way to mo del heterogeneity is to first generate equally-possible hydrofacies fields, and then convert these hydrofacies fields into hydraulic conductivity (Kj fields by assigning a single K value to each facies. This technique assumes relative homogeneity of K within each facies but may not be appropriate fo r the most conductive facies that often exhibits substantial variability. I n this paper, we assessed the impacts of assigning multiple random K, rathe r than a uniform K value, to the highly conductive facies on the results of a flow and transport model. A set of fifty stochastic hydrofacies maps dep icting an environment similar to the Snake River Plain aquifer (SRPA) in so uth-east Idaho were generated. Simulations demonstrated that a uniform K va lue, if carefully chosen, can reasonably reproduce the specific discharges and early particle arrival times produced by multiple K values. Yet, the re sults obtained with a uniform K value are dramatically less variable than t hose obtained with multiple K values. It is therefore concluded that stocha stic simulations with uniform K assigned to the most conductive and variabl e facies do not necessarily portray the entire uncertainty in the analyses.