Over the past 15 years, both linguists and psycholinguists have shown a gro
wing interest in the idea that syntactic structures can carry meanings that
are independent of the meanings of specific words. This article considers
how this idea relates to traditional notions of compositionality in generat
ive grammar, and examines two modern theories that, although based on diffe
rent starting assumptions, both readily allow syntactic structures to bear
independent meaning. We review work from psycholinguistics suggesting that
observation alone is often insufficient to support the efficient learning o
f word meanings, and that some of the 'slack' left by observation can be pi
cked up by the semantics of the syntactic structures in which words appear.
We argue that this convergence between linguistic theory and psycholinguis
tic experimentation should be no surprise, because language must be learnab
le.