Jp. Long et al., Five-year retrospective, multi-institutional pooled analysis of cancer-related outcomes after cryosurgical ablation of the prostate, UROLOGY, 57(3), 2001, pp. 518-523
Objectives. To define the potential role of cryosurgical ablation of the pr
ostate (CSAP) as a treatment option for patients with localized prostate ca
rcinoma (PCA), we performed a retrospective outcomes analysis of a large da
tabase of patients undergoing CSAP constructed from five institutions and c
ompared this with matching outcomes from contemporary reports of patient ou
tcomes after radiotherapy.
Methods. A total of 975 patients who underwent CSAP as primary therapy from
January 1993 to January 1998 with sufficient outcomes data available were
identified. Patients were stratified into three groups on the basis of thei
r clinical features. Biochemical-free survival (BFS), post-CSAP biopsy resu
lts, and post-CSAP morbidities were calculated and recorded.
Results. The median follow-up for all patients was 24 months. The percentag
es of patients in the low, medium, and high-risk groups were 25%, 34%, and
41%, respectively. For prostate-specific antigen thresholds of less than 0.
5 and less than 1.0 ng/mL, the 5-year actuarial BFS ranged from 36% to 61%
and 45% to 76%, respectively, depending on the risk category. Overall, the
positive biopsy rate was 18%, Morbidities included impotence in 93%, incont
inence in 7.5%, rectourethral fistula in 0.5%, and transurethral resection
of the prostate in 13% of patients (10% approved warming catheters versus 4
0% nonapproved).
Conclusions. For each risk group, the 5-year BFS and positive biopsy rate a
fter CSAP was comparable to matching outcomes reported after radiotherapy.
Morbidities also seemed comparable, with impotence rates higher and rectal
injury rates lower after CSAP than after radiotherapy. These data indicate
that CSAP can be performed with low morbidity and can produce cancer-relate
d results comparable to those reported for patients undergoing radiotherapy
. UROLOGY 57: 518-523, 2001. (C) 2001, Elsevier Science Inc.