R. Mehran et al., Treatment of focal in-stent restenosis with balloon angioplasty alone versus stenting: Short- and long-term results, AM HEART J, 141(4), 2001, pp. 610-614
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background Although both percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PT
CA) and additional stenting can be used For the treatment for focal in-sten
t restenosis (ISR), no large-scale comparative data on the clinical outcome
s after these interventional procedures have been reported.
Methods in the current study we compared the in-hospital and long-term clin
ical results of PTCA alone (n = 266 patients, n = 364 lesions) versus stent
ing (n = 135 patients, n = 161 lesions) for the treatment of focal ISR, def
ined as a lesion length less than or equal to 10 mm.
Results There were significantly more diabetic patients in the PTCA group t
han in the stent group (36% vs 26%, P = .04), but other baseline characteri
stics were similar. Lesion length and preprocedure minimal lumen diameter (
MLD) were also similar in the two groups, but the stent group had a larger
reference vessel diameter (3.40 +/- 0.73 mm vs 2.99 +/- 0.68 mm, P < .001).
Stenting achieved a larger postprocedure MLD than PTCA did (2.95 +/- 0.95
mm vs 2.23 +/- 0.60 mm, P < .001) and a smaller residual diameter stenosis
(11% + 15% vs 23% + 16%, P = .04). Angiographic success was achieved in all
cases. The rate of death/Q-wave infarction of urgent revascularization was
higher with PTCA than with stent (5.6% vs 0.7%, P = .02). Postprocedure cr
eatine kinase myocardial band enzyme elevation >5 times normal was more fre
quent with stent (18.5% vs 9.7%, P = .05). At 1 year the two interventional
strategies had similar cumulative mortality (4.6% PTCA vs 5.1% stent, P no
t significant) and target lesion revascularization rate (24.6% PTCA vs 26.5
% stent, P not significant). By multivariate analysis, the sole predictor o
f target lesion revascularization was diabetes (odds ratio 2.4, 95% confide
nce intervals 1.2-4.7, P = .01).
Conclusion Repeat stenting for the treatment of focal ISR had a higher post
procedure creatine kinase myocardial band elevation rate and similar long-t
erm clinical results compared with PTCA alone.