PURPOSE: To evaluate visual outcome after autologous ipsilateral rotating p
enetrating keratoplasty.
METHODS: The study included nine patients who consecutively underwent autol
ogous ipsilateral rotating penetrating keratoplasty for treatment of trauma
tic central corneal avascular scars. These patients were compared with 105
patients who consecutively underwent homologous central penetrating keratop
lasty in the same study period for treatment of avascular corneal scars ext
ending to the corneal periphery. All operations were performed by the same
surgeon. Mean follow-up time for both study groups was 31.27 +/- 21.54 and
32.0 +/- 19.4 months, respectively.
RESULTS: In the autologous rotating keratoplasty group, visual acuity incre
ased significantly (P = 0.03; Wilcoxon test) from 0.13 +/- 0.11 preoperativ
ely to 0.29 +/- 0.16 postoperatively, Refractive astigmatism and keratometr
ic astigmatism, respectively, increased (P = 0.02) from 3.19 +/- 2.53 diopt
ers and 3.20 +/- 2.24 diopters, respectively, preoperatively to 6.9 +/- 1.8
2 diopters and 9.55 +/- 4.32 diopters, respectively, postoperatively. Compa
ring the study groups, postoperative visual acuity was significantly lower
(P = 0.01), and keratometric astigmatism (P = 0.003) and refractive astigma
tism (P = 0.01) were significantly higher in the autologous rotating kerato
plasty group than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous ipsilateral rotating penetrating keratoplasty compa
red with homologous central penetrating keratoplasty is associated with a h
igh postoperative refractive and keratometric astigmatism leading to a rela
tively low postoperative visual acuity. It suggests that, in normal clinica
l conditions when donor material is available and postoperative follow-up e
xaminations can be performed, homologous central penetrating keratoplasty m
ay be superior to autologous ipsilateral rotating keratoplasty. (Am J Ophth
almol 2001;131:427-430, (C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc, All rights reserv
ed).