PURPOSE: We investigated the reliability, accuracy, and repeatability of an
autorefractor with the capability of over-refracting and measuring visual
acuity for use in children in a prospective study.
METHODS: Before and after cycloplegia, 68 children (mean +/- SD age, 10 +/-
3 years, range 5-16 years) underwent autorefraction twice with the HARK 59
9 Autorefractor (Humphrey Instruments Inc., San Leandro, CA), subjective ov
er-refraction through the HARK autorefractor, and subjective refraction usi
ng a phoro-optometer. After cycloplegia, retinoscopy was performed. Results
are reported for one eye (left) of each child.
RESULTS: For 68 eyes of 68 children, before and after cycloplegia, correlat
ion coefficients (R) for autorefraction reproducibility exceeded 0.95 for a
ll comparisons of sphere and cylinder. R for spherical values for autorefra
ction vs. over-refraction was 0.93 and vs. subjective refraction 0.83 befor
e cycloplegia and 0.94 and 0.97 after cycloplegia. Comparing values before
and after cycloplegia, autorefraction, over-refraction, and subjective refr
action, the data correlated > 0.81 for sphere and 0.75 to 0.87 for cylinder
. Cycloplegic retinoscopy compared with autorefraction, over-refraction, an
d subjective refraction had R > 0.86 for sphere and cylinder for all compar
isons except one. Cycloplegia increased the proportion of spherical equival
ent values within 0.625 D of the subjective refraction from 41 of 68 eyes (
61%) for auto- and over-refraction to 64 (94%) and 51 (75%) of the 68 eyes,
respectively. A visual acuity of 20/30 or better was produced in 50 of 68
(73%) eyes with automated refraction before and after cycloplegia and in 62
(92%) with subjective refraction before cycloplegia and subjective refract
ion and retinoscopy after cycloplegia. Subjective over-refraction did not s
ignificantly improve the visual acuity.
CONCLUSIONS: In children, HARK autorefraction improved in accuracy, when co
mpared to subjective refraction, and the level of visual acuity improved af
ter cycloplegia. Over-refraction through the instrument did not improve the
results before or after cycloplegia, (Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:438-441. (C
) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved).