Use of the HARK autorefractor in children

Citation
Sj. Isenberg et al., Use of the HARK autorefractor in children, AM J OPHTH, 131(4), 2001, pp. 438-441
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology,"da verificare
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
00029394 → ACNP
Volume
131
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
438 - 441
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9394(200104)131:4<438:UOTHAI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigated the reliability, accuracy, and repeatability of an autorefractor with the capability of over-refracting and measuring visual acuity for use in children in a prospective study. METHODS: Before and after cycloplegia, 68 children (mean +/- SD age, 10 +/- 3 years, range 5-16 years) underwent autorefraction twice with the HARK 59 9 Autorefractor (Humphrey Instruments Inc., San Leandro, CA), subjective ov er-refraction through the HARK autorefractor, and subjective refraction usi ng a phoro-optometer. After cycloplegia, retinoscopy was performed. Results are reported for one eye (left) of each child. RESULTS: For 68 eyes of 68 children, before and after cycloplegia, correlat ion coefficients (R) for autorefraction reproducibility exceeded 0.95 for a ll comparisons of sphere and cylinder. R for spherical values for autorefra ction vs. over-refraction was 0.93 and vs. subjective refraction 0.83 befor e cycloplegia and 0.94 and 0.97 after cycloplegia. Comparing values before and after cycloplegia, autorefraction, over-refraction, and subjective refr action, the data correlated > 0.81 for sphere and 0.75 to 0.87 for cylinder . Cycloplegic retinoscopy compared with autorefraction, over-refraction, an d subjective refraction had R > 0.86 for sphere and cylinder for all compar isons except one. Cycloplegia increased the proportion of spherical equival ent values within 0.625 D of the subjective refraction from 41 of 68 eyes ( 61%) for auto- and over-refraction to 64 (94%) and 51 (75%) of the 68 eyes, respectively. A visual acuity of 20/30 or better was produced in 50 of 68 (73%) eyes with automated refraction before and after cycloplegia and in 62 (92%) with subjective refraction before cycloplegia and subjective refract ion and retinoscopy after cycloplegia. Subjective over-refraction did not s ignificantly improve the visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: In children, HARK autorefraction improved in accuracy, when co mpared to subjective refraction, and the level of visual acuity improved af ter cycloplegia. Over-refraction through the instrument did not improve the results before or after cycloplegia, (Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:438-441. (C ) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved).