The ganciclovir implant plus oral ganciclovir versus parenteral cidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: The ganciclovir cidofovir cytomegalovirus retinitis trial
Da. Jabs, The ganciclovir implant plus oral ganciclovir versus parenteral cidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: The ganciclovir cidofovir cytomegalovirus retinitis trial, AM J OPHTH, 131(4), 2001, pp. 457-467
PURPOSE: To compare the regimen of the ganciclovir implant plus oral gancic
lovir to one of intravenous cidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus
retinitis.
METHODS: Sixty-one patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and cyt
omegalovirus retinitis were randomized either to the regimen of the gancicl
ovir implant plus oral ganciclovir, 1 gm three times daily, or intravenous
cidofovir, 5 mg/kg once weekly for two doses, followed by 5 mg/kg every oth
er week.
RESULTS: Mortality was similar between the two treatment groups. Mortality
rates were 0.41 per person-year in patients assigned to the ganciclovir reg
imen and 0.49 per person-year in patients assigned to cidofovir (P = .59).
Ocular outcomes were similar between the two groups. Retinitis progression
occurred at a rate of 0.67 per person-year in the ganciclovir group and 0.7
1 per person-year in the cidofovir group (P = .72), A loss of visual acuity
of 15 letters or more occurred at a rate of 0.78 per person-year in the ga
nciclovir group and 0.47 per person-year in the cidofovir group (P = .28).
The rate of loss of visual field was 7 degrees per month in the ganciclovir
group and 2 degrees per month in the cidofovir group (P = .048). Vitreous
hemorrhage was more common in the ganciclovir implant group (0.13 per perso
n year) than in the cidofovir group (no cases, P = .014), whereas uveitis a
ppeared to be more common in the cidofovir group (0.35 per person-year) tha
n in the ganciclovir group (0.09 per person-year, P = .066). Nephrotoxicity
(serum creatinine 1.6 mg/dL or greater) occurred at a rate of 0.18 per per
son-year in the ganciclovir group and 0.48 per person-year in the cidofovir
group (P = .10).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the small number of patients in this study limits def
initive interpretation, these data suggest that in the era of highly active
antiretroviral therapy, the regimens of the ganciclovir implant plus oral
ganciclovir and of intravenous cidofovir are similar for controlling cytome
galovirus retinitis and preventing visual loss but have different side effe
cts. (Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:457-467. (C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. A
ll rights reserved).