Wt. Cook et al., Influence of an interdental full pin on stability of an acrylic external fixator for rostral mandibular fractures in dogs, AM J VET RE, 62(4), 2001, pp. 576-580
Objective-To determine total stiffness and gap stiffness of an external fix
ation system in a canine mandibular fracture gap model incorporating a full
interdental pin as the only point of rostral fixation in a bilateral type-
I external fixator.
Sample Population-10 canine mandibles. Procedure-Bilateral mandibular ostec
tomies were performed between premolars 3 and 4. A type-I external fixator
incorporating a full interdental pin was placed to stabilize a 0.5-cm fract
ure gap. Four pin configurations (intact mandibular bodies with fixator; os
tectomized mandibular bodies and complete fixator; ostectomized mandibular
bodies with caudal pins of rostral fragment cut; ostectomized mandibular bo
dies with ail pins of rostral fragment cut) were tested in dorsoventral ben
ding 5 times on each mandible. The full interdental pin remained intact in
ail configurations. Total stiffness and gap stiffness were determined for e
ach configuration on a materials testing machine.
Results-Total stiffness of intact mandibles was significantly greater than
that of ostectomized mandibles, regardless of external fixator configuratio
n. However, total stiffness and gap stiffness were not significantly differ
ent among different external fixator configurations applied to ostectomized
mandibles.
Conclusion and Clinical Relevance-External fixator configurations with only
the full interdental pin engaging the rostral fragment were as stiff as co
nfigurations that had 2 or 4 additional pins in the rostral fragment for th
e applied loads. External fixators for rostral mandibular fractures may be
rigidly secured with rostral fragment implants applied extracortically, avo
iding iatrogenic trauma to teeth and tooth roots.