Background: In the past, recommendations on how to break the bad news of a
cancer diagnosis have been based on expert opinion. Recently, consensus-bas
ed guidelines for medical practitioners have been developed. The objective
of this work is to investigate patient preferences for communication practi
ces and to identify any disparities between these guidelines, patient prefe
rences and patient recollections of hearing their diagnosis.
Patients and methods: A consecutive sample of 131 newly diagnosed melanoma
patients were surveyed approximately 4 months after initial diagnosis to do
cument their preferences and recollections of their communication experienc
es.
Results: Of the 'breaking bad news' recommendations investigated, patients
did not strongly endorse the doctor helping tell others of the diagnosis or
telling the patient about cancer support services. Very few patients expre
ssed a preference for having another health professional present. One commu
nication feature, the patient feeling confident about getting the best trea
tment, was endorsed as 'very important' but does not feature in published g
uidelines. The most notable disparities between guidelines and the reported
experiences of patients related to perceived delays in receiving the diagn
osis, and having adequate opportunity to ask their clinician questions.
Conclusion: Current Australian recommendations on how to communicate a diag
nosis of cancer were generally supported by the patients' expressed prefere
nces, but several modifications are proposed.
Implications: Suggestions are offered to help overcome the disparities iden
tified between recommendations and patients' preferences when a diagnosis o
f cancer is being communicated.