Background: To improve the radiotherapy results, we evaluated etoposide as
an effective radiosensitizer by using cultured cell-lines. Materials and Me
thods: Forts cell fines having different doubling times (DT) were used: V79
(Chinese hamster fibroblasts, DT=9 hours), (1), T24 (human bladder cancer;
DT=19 hours) (2), MDA-MB231 (human breast cancel; DT=25-30 hours) (3) and
RMG1 (human ovarian cancer; DT=50 hours) (4). Cell survival was determined
by colony assay and cell cycle analysis was performed by flow-cytometry. Re
sults; The survival curves showed RMG1 to be the most radiosensitive, follo
wed by MDA-MB231, T24, and V79. V79 was most che mosensitive to etoposide,
followed by T24, MDA-MB231 and RMG1. Neither 24-hours exposure to etoposide
(less than or equal to0.05 mug/ml) ol 0.5-h exposure (less than or equal t
o1.0 mug/ml) had any cell killing effect on any of the cell lines used. Whe
n the cells were irradiated after exposure to 1 mug/ml of etoposide fos 0.5
hours, no radiosensitization was observed in any of the cell lines Except
V79. Enhanced radiosensitivity was observed in V79 and T24 cells (which hav
e a relatively short DT) when they wt re incubated with 0.05 mug/ml etoposi
de for 23 hours brat no enhanced effect was seen in MDA-MB231 ol RMG1 cells
(which have a relatively long DT). Conclusion: It is suggested that a comb
ination of radiation and etoposide may be useful in the treatment of rapidl
y growing cancel.