Da. Hurley et al., Interferential therapy electrode placement technique in acute low back pain: A preliminary investigation, ARCH PHYS M, 82(4), 2001, pp. 485-493
Objective: To determine the efficacy of interferential therapy (IFT) electr
ode placement technique compared with a control treatment in subjects with
acute low back pain (LBP).
Design: Single-blind, randomized. controlled trial with a 3-month follow-up
.
Setting: Outpatient physiotherapy departments in hospital and university se
ttings.
Patients: A random sample of 60 eligible patients with back pain (28 men, 3
2 women) were recruited by general practitioners and self-referral for phys
iotherapy treatment and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups.
Interventions: (1) "IFT painful area" and The Back Book, (2) "IFT spinal ne
rve" and The Back Book, and (3) "Control," The Back Book only. Standardized
IFT stimulation parameters were used: carrier frequency 3.85kHz: 140Hz con
stant: pulse duration 130 mus; 30 minutes' duration.
Main Outcome Measures: Pain Rating Index, Roland-Morris Disability Question
naire (RMDQ). and EuroQol were completed by subjects pretreatment, at disch
arge, and 3-month follow-up.
Results: All groups had significant improvements in all outcomes at follow-
up. Subjects managed by IFT spinal nerve and The Bark Book displayed both a
statistically significant (p = .030) and clinically meaningful reduction i
n functional disability (RMDQ), compared with management via IFT painful ar
ea and The Back Book combined or The Buck Book alone.
Conclusions: The findings showed that IFT electrode placement technique aff
ects LBP-specific functional disability, providing preliminary implications
for future clinical studies.