In a balanced, constitutionally governed state, military decision-makers ar
e no more likely to recommend war in a dispute than are civilian leaders. H
owever, in military regimes, there is a tendency to import biases that syst
ematically distort the contribution of a state's foreign and interior minis
tries. Consequently, military governments become overly pessimistic about t
he scarcity of security and overconfident about the utility of force. Using
the case of war decisions in Pakistan from 1947-1971, this article suggest
s that the process of militarized decision-making increases the tendency of
a military regime to advocate war when isolated from civilian counterbalan
ces.