Secondary failure of platelet recovery after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Citation
B. Bruno et al., Secondary failure of platelet recovery after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, BIOL BLOOD, 7(3), 2001, pp. 154-162
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology
Journal title
BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
10838791 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
154 - 162
Database
ISI
SICI code
1083-8791(2001)7:3<154:SFOPRA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
After primary recovery of platelet counts after transplantation, there can be a late persistent decline called secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR), which may occur although the counts of other cell lineages remain w ithin the normal range. SFPR was defined as a decline of platelet counts be low 20,000/muL, for 7 consecutive days or requiring transfusion support aft er achieving sustained platelet counts greater than or equal to 50,000/muL without transfusions for 7 consecutive days after hematopoietic stem cell t ransplantation (HSCT). The study population consisted of 2871 consecutive p atients receiving transplants from January 1990 to March 1997. After primar y recovery of platelet counts, SFPR not due to relapse of the underlying di sease was observed in 285 of 1401 (20%) patients undergoing allogeneic tran splantation and 36 (8%) of 444 patients undergoing autologous transplantati on, with a median time of onset after transplantation at day 63 (range, day 21-156) and day 44 (range, day 24-89), respectively. Concomitant neutropen ia was seen in 57 (20%) of 285 patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT and 7 (1 9%) of 36 patients undergoing autologous HSCT with SFPR. By multivariable a nalysis, the following were factors significantly associated with SFPR afte r allogeneic HSCT: a transplant from an unrelated donor; a graft-versus-hos t disease (GVHD) prophylaxis other than methotrexate and cyclosporine; deve lopment of grade 2 through 4 acute GVHD; impaired renal or liver function; conditioning with the combination of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation; stem cell dose; and infections. Cytomegalovirus infection after engraftment and source of stem cells were the only significant risk factors after autologous HSCT. The hazard rate of death was significantly h igher in patients who experienced SFPR (hazard ratio = 2.6 for allogeneic H SCT; hazard ratio = 2.2 for autologous HSCT). SFPR was associated with seri ous complications and poor outcome after transplantation. The identificatio n of the characteristics and risk factors for SFPR could improve patient co unseling and management and lead to the design of effective treatment strat egies.