The present report studied the contingent negative variation during Gap and
Non-Gap conditions using visual stimulation and manual responses. The reac
tion times during the Gap condition were facilitated compared with those of
the Non-Gap condition. The contingent negative variation component was obt
ained during the preparatory period from electrodes placed at 58 scalp site
s for both Gap and Non-Gap conditions. The comparison between both conditio
ns: Gap and non-gap did not show statistically significant differences duri
ng the preparatory period. The topography of the voltage and current source
density maps showed three different foci: (i) an early negativity centred
in electrodes overlying the supplementary motor area and cingulate motor ar
eas, (ii) an activation over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the
finger movement, and (iii) a bilateral activation on posterior sites. All t
hese results suggest that the facilitation induced by the warning stimuli o
ccurs in neural circuits that would be recruited for the subsequent process
ing of the imperative stimulus. The facilitation of the reaction times duri
ng the gap condition with respect to non-gap condition must be justified by
neural events occurring during the gap period.