Trisomy 8 and monosomy 7 detected in bone marrow using primed in situ labeling, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and conventional cytogenetic analyses. A study of 54 cases with hematological disorders
J. Yan et al., Trisomy 8 and monosomy 7 detected in bone marrow using primed in situ labeling, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and conventional cytogenetic analyses. A study of 54 cases with hematological disorders, CANC GENET, 125(1), 2001, pp. 30-40
Trisomy 8 and monosomy 7 are the two most frequent aneuploidies found in he
matological disorders such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myel
oid leukemia (AML). In this study, primed in situ labeling (PRINS), fluores
cence in situ hybridization (FISH) and conventional cytogenetic approaches
were used to investigate 54 cases of hematopoietic disorders. Of these case
s, there were 22 cases of trisomy 8, 2 cases of tetrasomy 8, 14 cases of mo
nosomy 7, and 16 cases with two copies of both chromosomes 7 and 8. PRINS w
as carried out in interphase nuclei of bone marrow samples using primers th
at can specifically detect alpha -satellite DNA sequences of chromosomes 7
and S. In parallel, using the alpha -satellite probes for chromosomes 7 and
8, FISH was performed for all the cases. PRINS and FISH techniques showed
similar specificity and sensitivity. In comparison to FISH, PRINS is more a
dvantageous since it is a faster, easier, and more cost-effective technique
. Additionally, for most of the cases, a higher proportion of aneuploidy wa
s detected in metaphases using conventional cytogenetics, as compared to th
e one found in interphase nuclei identified with PRINS and FISH techniques.
In other words, for these cases, the cells with trisomy 8 or monosomy 7, h
ad a distinct proliferative advantage compared to the disomic cell populati
on. Therefore, to better quantify the proportion of aneuploid cells in bane
marrow, we recommend to investigate the frequency of aneuploidy in nuclei
using PRINS, rather than studying only the dividing cells as detected by co
nventional cytogenetic techniques. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science me. All rights
reserved.