Sm. Opal et al., CONFIRMATORY INTERLEUKIN-1 RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST TRIAL IN SEVERE SEPSIS- A PHASE-III, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER TRIAL, Critical care medicine, 25(7), 1997, pp. 1115-1124
Objective: To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of recombi
nant human interleukin-l receptor antagonist (rhIL-1ra) in the treatme
nt of patients with severe sepsis. Design: Prospective, randomized, do
uble-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a planned, mids
tudy, interim analysis, Setting: Ninety-one academic medical center in
tensive care units in North America and Europe, Patients: Patients wit
h severe sepsis or septic shock (n = 696) received standard supportive
care and antimicrobial therapy for sepsis, in addition to rhIL-1ra or
placebo. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either rh
IL-1ra (100 mg) or placebo (vehicle) by intravenous bolus, followed by
a 72-hr continuous intravenous infusion of either rhIL-1ra (2.0 mg/kg
/hr) or placebo. Measurements and Main Results: The study was terminat
ed after an interim analysis found that it was unlikely that the prima
ry efficacy end points would be met, The 28-day, all-cause mortality r
ate was 33.1% (116/350) in the rhIL-1ra treatment group, while the mor
tality rate in the placebo group was 36.4% (126/346), yielding a 9% re
duction in mortality rate (p = .36). The patients were well matched at
the time of study entry; 52.9% of placebo-treated patients were in sh
ock while 50.9% of rhIL-1ra-treated patients were in shock at the time
of study entry (p = .30). The mortality rate did not significantly di
ffer between treatment groups when analyzed on the basis of site of in
fection, infecting microorganism, presence of bacteremia, shock, organ
dysfunction, or predicted risk of mortality at the time of study entr
y, No excess number of adverse reactions or microbial superinfections
were attributable to rhIL-1ra treatment in this study. Conclusions: A
72-hr, continuous intravenous infusion of rhIL-1ra failed to demonstra
te a statistically significant reduction in mortality when compared wi
th standard therapy in this multicenter clinical trial. It rhIL-1ra tr
eatment has any therapeutic activity in severe sepsis, the incremental
benefits are small and will be difficult to demonstrate in a patient
population as defined by this clinical trial.