In recent years, some studies on the expression of CD95(Fas/ APO-1) ligand
(CD95L) in tissues or cells raised concerns about the specificity of the an
tibodies used, We therefore tested 12 CD95L antibodies for their reliabilit
y in immunocyto/ histochemistry by (i) staining CD95L-transfected and contr
ol CV-1/EBNA cells and (ii) comparing staining patterns in immunohistochemi
cally labeled tissue sections with the localization of CD95L+ cells in in s
itu hybridization, While G247-4, NOK-1, NOK-2, 4H9, and MIKE-1 stained CD95
L-transfected cells and did not significantly bind to controls, G247-4 was
the only antibody giving satisfying signals in tissue sections perfectly ma
tching the distribution of CD95L+ cells by in situ hybridization. MAb 33, C
-20, and N-20 comparably stained both transfected and control cells and sho
wed considerable background or falsely positive staining in sections. MIKE-
5, 8B8, A11, and 4A5 did not or only very faintly bind to either cells and,
thus, were not tested on sections. We conclude that G247-4 is the only tes
ted antibody that is recommendable for immunohistochemistry.