Mh. Kollef et al., BLEED - A CLASSIFICATION TOOL TO PREDICT OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE UPPER AND LOWER GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE, Critical care medicine, 25(7), 1997, pp. 1125-1132
Objective: To develop an outcome prediction tool (BLEED: ongoing bleed
ing, low systolic blood pressure, elevated prothrombin time, erratic m
ental status, unstable comorbid disease) for clinical use in patients
with either acute upper or acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhag
e. Design: A cohort study. Setting: Barnes Hospital and Jewish Hospita
l, two private university-affiliate teaching hospitals in St. Louis, M
O. Patients: Four hundred sixty five patients with either acute upper
or acute lower GI hemorrhage admitted from the emergency department. I
nterventions: Admission of patients to the intensive care unit or hosp
ital ward was determined by emergency department physicians, without u
se or knowledge of BLEED criteria, Patients meeting any BLEED criteria
at their initial assessment in the emergency department were classifi
ed as ''high-risk.'' All other patients were classified as ''low-risk.
'' Measurements and Main Results: The main outcome measure was the occ
urrence of an inhospital complication, defined as recurrent GI hemorrh
age, surgery to control the source of hemorrhage, and hospital mortali
ty. Patients classified as high-risk had significantly greater rates o
f inhospital complications at both Barnes Hospital (relative risk, 2.4
7; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 4.44; p < .001) and Jewish Hospita
l (relative risk, 8.94; 95% confidence interval, 3.92 to 20.41; p<.001
) compared with patients classified as low-risk Patients classified as
high-risk at either hospital were significantly more likely to develo
p additional organ system derangements, require a greater number of tr
ansfused units of packed red brood cells, and have longer hospital sta
ys compared with patients classified as low risk (p < .006). The BLEED
classification also identified a greater frequency of intensive care
admission for both low-risk (RR, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.24 to 7.89) and high-
risk (relative risk, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 2.02) pati
ents at Barnes Hospital compared with those patients at Jewish Hospita
l, although no beneficial effects on patient outcome were reported. Co
nclusions: The BLEED classification, applied at initial emergency depa
rtment evaluation and before admission, predicts hospital outcomes for
patients with acute upper or lower GI hemorrhage. This outcome predic
tion tool also identified Variations in intensive care utilization bet
ween two hospitals.