Efficacy and safety of intraarticular sodium hyaluronate in knee osteoarthritis

Citation
Kd. Brandt et al., Efficacy and safety of intraarticular sodium hyaluronate in knee osteoarthritis, CLIN ORTHOP, (385), 2001, pp. 130-143
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
ISSN journal
0009921X → ACNP
Issue
385
Year of publication
2001
Pages
130 - 143
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-921X(200104):385<130:EASOIS>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in 226 patients with knee osteoarthritis to evaluate the safety a nd efficacy of intraarticular injections of sodium hyaluronate, Patients we re randomized to three weekly injections of 30 mg sodium hyaluronate or phy siologic saline (control) and were observed for an additional 25 weeks, In comparison with the control group, among patients who completed at least 15 weeks of the study and whose Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Ost eoarthritis Index pain score for the contralateral knee was less than 12 at baseline, sodium hyaluronate injection resulted in improvement in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score, patient and investigator global assessments, and pain on standing from Weeks 7 to 2 7, Fifty-eight percent of patients treated with sodium hyaluronate achieved a 5-unit or greater improvement in mean pain score from Weeks 7 through 27 , compared with 40% of control patients. Tn addition, nearly twice as many patients treated with sodium hyaluronate as with saline (30% versus 17%, re spectively) achieved a net improvement of at least 7 units. In contrast to treatment with saline, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthr itis Index pain score for the contralateral knee was inversely related to t he magnitude of improvement after treatment with sodium hyaluronate, Few si de effects were attributed to treatment, and no differences between treatme nt groups were seen in this respect (sodium hyaluronate, nine [8%]; saline, 11 [10%]). The incidence of injection site reactions was low (sodium hyalu ronate, 1.2 %; saline, 1.5 %). The results indicate that sodium hyaluronate treatment is well tolerated and produces statistically and clinically sign ificant improvement of symptoms in patients with mild to moderate knee oste oarthritis in whom pain in the contralateral knee is relatively modest.