Reconstruction of environmental conditions from biological indicators, such
as chironomids, can provide valuable insight into the variance of natural
systems and the extent of current environmental problems. Various numerical
techniques have been developed for this challenging task, based on differe
nt models and assumptions, but ignoring some of the uncertainties inherent
in the reconstruction.
We study the use of Bayesian modeling and inference in organism-based palae
oenvironmental reconstruction. We propose a Bayesian model, BUM, and compar
e it empirically with eight other methods, including the widely used weight
ed averaging (WA) technique. The methods are evaluated on a surface-sedimen
t chironomid training data set from 53 subarctic lakes in northern Fennosca
ndia by comparing the prediction statistics of these data. The resulting ca
libration models are also applied to fossil chironomid assemblages in order
to evaluate the differences in Holocene temperature reconstructions. The e
mpirical results indicate that BUM is competitive compared with the state-o
f-the-art methods.
We also describe a generic Bayesian framework for reconstruction, to demons
trate Bayesian tools for reasoning with a variety of ecological response mo
dels. Bayesian statistics support the "classical" approach to regression an
d calibration whereas the state-of-the-art methods, including WA, are based
on the conceptually more controversial "inverse" approach. Further, the us
e of probability distributions rather than point estimates for species resp
onses gives a principled method for handling uncertainty in response modeli
ng.