Objective: To determine anthropometric and body composition changes in fema
le bodybuilders during preparation for competition.
Design: There was an attempt to match subjects in the control and experimen
tal groups for height and percentage body fat (%BF for the initial test of
this longitudinal study.
Subjects: Five competitive bodybuilders ((X) over bar +/- s.d.: 35.3 +/- 5.
7 y; 167.3 +/- 3.7 cm; 66.38 +/- 6.30 kg; 18.3 +/- 3.5 %BF) and five athlet
ic females ((X) over bar +/- s.d.: 30.9 +/- 13.0 y; 166.9 +/- 3.9 cm; 55.94
+/- 3.59 kg; 19.1 +/- 3.3 %BF) were recruited from advertisements in a bod
ybuilding newsletter and placed on sports centre noticeboards.
Interventions: The following measurements were conducted 12 weeks, 6 weeks
and 3-5 d before the bodybuilders' competitions: anthropometric profile, bo
dy density by underwater weighing, total body water via deuterium dilution
and bone mineral mass from a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan. A combi
nation of the last three measurements enabled the %BF to the determined by
a four compartment model.
Results: A significant (P less than or equal to 0.001) 5.80 kg body mass lo
ss by the bodybuilders as they prepared for competition was primarily due t
o a reduction in fat mass (FM; -4.42 kg; 76.2%) as opposed to fat-free mass
(FFM; -1.38kg; 23.8%). The decreases in body mass and FM over the final 6
weeks were greater than those over the first 6 weeks. Their %BF decreased (
P < 0.001) from 18.3 to 12.7, whereas the values for the control group rema
ined essentially unchanged at 19.1-19.6 %BF. These body composition changes
by the bodybuilders were accompanied by a significant decline (P < 0.001)
of 25.5 mm (76.3-50.8 mm) in the sum of eight skinfold thicknesses (triceps
+ subscapular + biceps + iliac crest C supraspinale + abdominal + front th
igh + medial calf).
Conclusions: Although the bodybuilders presented with low %BFs at the start
of the experiment, they still significantly decreased their body mass duri
ng the 12 week preparation for competition and most of this loss was due to
a reduction in FM as opposed to FFM.
Sponsorship: Australian Research Council (small grants scheme).