M. Lindstrom et al., Socioeconomic differences in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and fruit juices - The influence of psychosocial factors, EUR J PUB H, 11(1), 2001, pp. 51-59
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Background: The aim was to investigate whether social network and social su
pport factors can explain socioeconomic differences in the risk of consumin
g low amounts of vegetables, fruit and fruit juices. Methods: The Malmo Die
t and Cancer Study was a prospective cohort study, The present cross-sectio
nal study examined data from a subpopulation of 11,837 individuals that com
pleted baseline examinations in 1992-1994, Dietary habits were assessed usi
ng a modified diet history method, and socioeconomic and social network fac
tors were measured with a structured questionnaire. Low consumption was def
ined as the lowest consumption quartile for vegetables and fruit, while fru
it juice consumption was dichotomised to separate users from non-users. Res
ults: Socioeconomic differences were most pronounced regarding the consumpt
ion of vegetables and fruit juices, For both sexes, unskilled manual worker
s had a twice as high risk of low vegetable and fruit juice consumption as
higher non-manual employees. No socioeconomic differences in fruit consumpt
ion were observed for men, and only moderate differences for women with a h
igher consumption in higher socioeconomic groups. When the psychosocial var
iables were introduced in the multivariate model, social participation mode
rately reduced the socioeconomic differences in vegetable consumption, and
the female socioeconomic differences in fruit consumption, but had no effec
t on the socioeconomic differences in fruit juice consumption, The other ps
ychosocial variables had no effect on the socioeconomic differences. Conclu
sion: Considerable socioeconomic differences in vegetable, fruit and fruit
juice consumption were observed. Social participation seemed to be a strong
determinant for these food choices. However, this effect was largely indep
endent of the socioeconomic differences.