Differences in renal response between endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Citation
Mhwa. Wijnen et al., Differences in renal response between endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, EUR J VAS E, 21(2), 2001, pp. 171-174
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
10785884 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
171 - 174
Database
ISI
SICI code
1078-5884(200102)21:2<171:DIRRBE>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objectives: to determine the difference in venal and systemic response betw een open and endovascular aneurysm repair. Materials and Methods: toe studied prospectively 22 patients undergoing ope n repair (OR) and 15 patients undergoing endovascular repair (ER). Blood an d urine samples were taken preoperatively (T0) and before clamping of the a orta or femoral artery (T1) and 5 min (T2), 1h (T3), 6h (T4), 24h (Day 1) a nd 48h (Day 2) after declamping. Albumin/ creatinin untie (AC ratio) in uri ne, serum albumin, serum creatinin, serum C-reactive protein and serum lact ate were determined. Results: the urinary AC ratio in ER was significantly lower than in OR (p<0 .001). In both groups the rise in urine albumin/creatinin ratio after decla mping (T2, T3) was significant (p<0.001). C-reactive protein was raised sig nificantly at day 2 and 2 in both groups (p<0.001) with no difference betwe en the groups. Serum lactate values were significantly higher in OR. There was a significant increase in serum lactate 6h after declamping in the ER g roup. Conclusions: after endovascular repair renal damage is less compared to ope n repair. There is a significant systemic reaction to the endovascular repa ir causing mild, shout-lasting damage to the kidney. This systemic response is most probably induced by a combination of ischaemia reperfusion? injury and the surgical trauma of the procedure. Other possible explanations are discussed.