Color Doppler ultrasonography and spectral analysis of venous flow in diagnosis of varicocele

Citation
Ai. Tasci et al., Color Doppler ultrasonography and spectral analysis of venous flow in diagnosis of varicocele, EUR UROL, 39(3), 2001, pp. 316-321
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
EUROPEAN UROLOGY
ISSN journal
03022838 → ACNP
Volume
39
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
316 - 321
Database
ISI
SICI code
0302-2838(200103)39:3<316:CDUASA>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Objective: The standardization of diagnostic criteria for varicocele has no t yet been established. This causes difficulty in evaluating both the incid ence and clinical studies. Our aim was to establish diagnostic criteria for varicocele in Doppler procedures. Methods: The characteristics of blood flow in the internal spermatic vein w ere investigated with color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) and venous flow s pectral analysis in 100 infertile men without clinical varicocele (group I) , 100 infertile men with clinical left varicocele (group II), and 50 fertil e men without clinical varicocele served as controls (group III). Results: Th ree types of flow pattern were found in the spectra I analysis of venous flow. If the venous flow was directed to the heart and did not ch ange direction with an intra-abdominal pressure increase, it was classified as type I; venous flow directed to the heart, but changing direction with an intra-abdominal pressure increase, was classified as type II, and blood flow directed to the testicles and augmenting with an intra-abdominal press ure increase, was classified as type III. In group I, flow patterns were 39 , 56 and 5% on the left side and 55, 42 and 3% on the right side for types I. II and III, respectively. In group If, flow patterns were 0, 35 and 65% on the left side and 61, 38 and 1% on the right side for type I, II and III patterns, respectively. In group III, the figures were 44, 54 and 2% for t he left and 54, 46 and 0% for the right. Type II and III flow patterns were seen more frequently than type I in patients with clinical left varicocele (p<0.001). Whereas type I and II flow patterns were more common than type III in subjects without clinical varicocele (p<0.05). A type II flow patter n during normal breathing was seen at a lower rate in the control group tha n in the other groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Spectral analysis of Doppler waves should be used in combinatio n with CDU for the diagnosis of varicocele. Varicocele should not only be d iagnosed with a type II flow pattern which occurs during valsalva. For the diagnosis of varicocele, the main criterion must be a type III pattern flow , as well as a type II pattern during normal breathing. Copyright <(c)> 200 1 S. Karger AG, Basel.