Pk. Mar et al., Stress fiber formation is required for matrix reorganization in a corneal myofibroblast cell line, EXP EYE RES, 72(4), 2001, pp. 455-466
Corneal wound healing fibroblasts (myofibroblasts) develop a muscle-like co
ntractile apparatus composed of prominent microfilament bundles (stress fib
ers) and express alpha -smooth muscle actin (alpha -SMA). In this study, ge
lsolin, an actin filament-severing protein, was overexpressed in a alpha -S
MA-expressing corneal myofibroblast cell line (TRK43) to assess whether int
act stress fibers are required for in vitro matrix organization and wound c
ontraction. Stably integrated gelsolin was introduced by electroporation of
an expression construct (pREPCG8) into cultured cells. Thirty-seven clones
were isolated with half of the clones showing a fibroblastic phenotype whi
le the remaining half appeal ed epithelioid. One fibroblastic clone, GS56,
and one epithelioid clone, GS44, were selected for detailed characterizatio
n. The GS56 cells appeared highly elongated and spindle-shaped and had prom
inent stress fibers and focal adhesions. GS44 cells showed disruption of st
ress fibers and a cortical f-actin organization as well as the down regulat
ion of alpha -SMA expression by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting. B
oth phenotypes showed enhanced gelsolin expression; however, fractionation
of cell extracts demonstrated differences in the subcellular distribution o
f gelsolin with GS44 cells having markedly reduced and GSSG cells having ma
rkedly increased cytoskeletal gelsolin. In an in vitro wound contraction as
say, epithelioid GS44 cells showed a significantly impaired ability to cont
ract a collagen matrix compared to that of TRK43 cells, CT9 or GS56 transfe
ctants. Loss of stress fibers in GS44 cells also correlated. with enhanced
cell motility. Together, these results demonstrate that the ability to form
microfilament bundles or stress fibers is required for matrix; organizatio
n and contraction by corneal myofibroblasts. Although no clear explanation
is available, we suspect that differences in gene insertion of the gelsolin
overexpression vector may have led to differential intercellular localizat
ion of gelsolin and its effect on stress fiber formation in the two cell li
nes. (C) 2001 Academic Press.