Radiofrequency energy delivered to the gastroesophageal junction for the treatment of GERD

Citation
G. Triadafilopoulos et al., Radiofrequency energy delivered to the gastroesophageal junction for the treatment of GERD, GASTROIN EN, 53(4), 2001, pp. 407-415
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
00165107 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
407 - 415
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5107(200104)53:4<407:REDTTG>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Background: In this multi-center study, the feasibility, safety, and effici ency of radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery to the gastroesophageal junctio n (GEJ) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were in vestigated. Methods: Forty-seven patients with classic symptoms of GERD (heartburn and/ or regurgitation), a daily anti-secretory medication requirement, and at le ast partial symptom response to drugs were enrolled. All patients had patho logic esophageal acid exposure by 24-hour pH study, a 2 cm or smaller hiata l hernia, grade 2 or less esophagitis, and no significant dysmotility of dy sphagia. RF energy was delivered with a catheter and thermocouple-controlle d generator to create submucosal thermal lesions in the muscle of the GEJ. GERD symptoms and quality of life were assessed at 0, 1, 4, and 6 months wi th short-form health survey (SF-36). Anti-secretory medications were withdr awn 7 days before each assessment of symptoms and pH/motility study. Medica tion use, endoscopic findings, esophageal acid exposure, and motility were assessed at 0 and 6 months. Results: Thirty-two men and 15 women underwent treatment. At 6 months there were improvements in the median heartburn score (4 to 1, p less than or eq ual to 0.0001), GERD score (26 to 7, p less than or equal to 0.0001), satis faction (1 to 4, p less than or equal to 0.0001), mental SF-36 (46.2 to 55. 5, p less than or equal to 0.01), physical SF-36 (41.1 to 51.9, p less than or equal to 0.0001), and esophageal acid exposure (11.7% to 4.8%, p less t han or equal to 0.0001). Esophagitis was present in 25 patients before trea tment (15 grade 1 and 10 grade 2) and 8 had esophagitis at 6 months (4 grad e 1 and 4 grade 2, p less than or equal to 0.005). At 6 months, 87% no long er required proton pump inhibitor medication. There was no significant chan ge in median lower esophageal sphincter pressure (14.0 to 12.0 mm Hg, p = 0 .19), peristaltic amplitude (64 to 666 mm Hg, p = 0.71), or lower esophagea l sphincter length (3.0 to 3.0, p = 0.28). There were 3 self-limited compli cations (fever for 24 hours, odynophagia lasting for 5 days, and a linear m ucosal injury that was healed after 3 weeks). Conclusion: RF energy delivery significantly improved GERD symptoms, qualit y of life, and esophageal acid exposure while eliminating the need for anti -secretory medication in the majority of patients of patients with a hetero genous spectrum of clinical disease severity but with minimal active esopha gitis or hiatal hernia.