EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of lymphoma

Citation
A. Ribeiro et al., EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of lymphoma, GASTROIN EN, 53(4), 2001, pp. 485-491
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
ISSN journal
00165107 → ACNP
Volume
53
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
485 - 491
Database
ISI
SICI code
0016-5107(200104)53:4<485:EFACWF>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Background: Limited information is available regarding the use of EUS-guide d fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders, The aim of this study was to evaluate the yield of this techniqu e in the primary diagnosis of lymphoma. Methods: The records were reviewed of 38 consecutive patients with GI lesio ns and/or enlarged lymph nodes identified on imaging studies that raised a suspicion of lymphoma who underwent EUS-FNA of lymph nodes or the gut wall. Final diagnosis was based on clinical follow-up, imaging studies, or surgi cal findings. Results: Twenty-three patients with lymphoma and 15 patients with benign di sease or reactive lymphadenopathy were identified. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA cytology with flow cytometry/immunocy tochemistry (FC/IC) for the diagnosis of lymphoma were, respectively, 74%, 93%, and 81%. When comparing patients who had EUS-FNA with FC/IC versus tho se who had EUS-FNA without FC/IC, sensitivity was 86% versus 44% (p = 0.04) , specificity was 100% versus 90% (not significant), and accuracy was 89% v ersus 68% (not significant). Conclusion: EUS-FNA can provide cytology specimens diagnostic for lymphoma. Selective use of FC/IC in patients with suspected lymphoma improves the yi eld of EUS-FNA and may guide diagnostic evaluation and treatment decisions.