Twin pregnancies constitute the most serious complication for both mother a
nd children after IVF/ICSI treatment, but transfer of at least two 'best lo
oking' embryos remains the standard policy. This is due to our inability an
d reluctance to identify both the 'twin prone' patient and the top quality
embryo. Some centres now electively transfer a single embryo (eSET) when pa
rticular embryo quality and patient criteria are met. Results from several
centres were presented during an ESHRE Campus Course, held on May 6th 2000.
Sound clinical trials are needed to clarify several points of discussion.
What is the clinical profile of patients in whom eSET should be considered?
Will the overall (ongoing) pregnancy rate of the IVF/ICSI programme decrea
se if eSET is performed in these patients? What is the twinning rate when e
SET is a routine policy? Will the financial gain by avoiding perinatal hosp
italization costs of prevented twins be balanced by the likely need to perf
orm a number of extra IVF/ICSI cycles? What will be gained by freezing the
extra number of high quality embryos? Should eSET be performed at the 2 pro
nuclear stage, the early cleaving embryo or the blastocyst stage? Common se
nse dictates that eSET as a concept should be applied from now onwards.