This article examines the global forces that are responsible for the transf
ormation of the meaning and practice of UNI-ICR's humanitarianism, and asks
whether a transformation that enables the organization to become more deep
ly involved in the internal affairs of states is welcome or worrisome. I op
en by reviewing the changing relationship between multilateralism, sovereig
nty and humanitarianism, and link that conceptual discussion to the interna
tional refugee regime. I then argue that the combination of state pressures
and the normative principle of popular sovereignty enabled a more politica
l and pragmatic UNHCR to widen its activities under the humanitarian banner
and to become more deeply involved in the circumstances in the refugee-pro
ducing country. This expanding humanitarian umbrella, I suggest, might be a
stealth agent for a policy of containment and a threat to refugee rights.
This possibility is suggested by recent debates over the category of intern
ally displaced peoples; the decided preference for repatriation; and UNHCR'
s involvement in reintegration activities. These developments generate the
worrisome possibility that a more pragmatic UNHCR is potentially (though un
wittingly) implicated in a system of containment. I conclude by reflecting
on UNHCR's role in global politics and the dangers of a sovereignty-led hum
anitarianism.