Low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with montelukast for first-line treatment of persistent asthma: A randomized clinical trial

Citation
W. Busse et al., Low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with montelukast for first-line treatment of persistent asthma: A randomized clinical trial, J ALLERG CL, 107(3), 2001, pp. 461-468
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
ISSN journal
00916749 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
461 - 468
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-6749(200103)107:3<461:LFPCWM>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Background: Both inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene modifiers are used in the maintenance treatment of persistent asthma. Objective: The goal was to compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose flut icasone propionate (FP) and montelukast as first-line maintenance therapy i n symptomatic patients by using short-acting beta (2)-agonists alone to tre at persistent asthma. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, paral lel-group study 533 patients (>15 years old) with persistent asthma who rem ained symptomatic while taking short-acting beta (2)-agonists alone were tr eated with FP (88 mug [2 puffs of 44 mug] twice daily) or montelukast (10 m g once daily) for 24 weeks. Results: Compared with treatment with montelukast, treatment with FP result ed in significantly greater improvements at endpoint in morning predose FEV 1 (22.9% vs 14.5%, P < .001), forced midexpiratory flow (0.66 vs 0.41 L/sec , P < .001), forced vital capacity (0.42 vs 0.29 L, P = .002), morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (68.5 vs 34.1 L/min, P < .001), and evening PEF (53. 9 vs 28.7 L/min, P < .001). Similar improvements in PEF were observed in pa tients with milder asthma (>70%-80% predicted FEV1). At endpoint, FP was mo re effective than montelukast at decreasing rescue albuterol use (3.1 puffs /day vs 2.3 puffs/day, P < .001), asthma symptom scores (-0.85 [48.6% decre ase] vs -0.60 [30.5%], P < .001), and night-time awakenings due to asthma ( -0.64 awakenings/night [62% decrease] vs -0.48 awakenings/night [47.5%], P = .023), and FP increased the percentage of symptom-free days (32.0% vs 18. 4% of days, P < .001) compared with montelukast. The adverse event and asth ma exacerbation profiles for FP and montelukast were similar. Conclusions: Low-dose FP is more effective than montelukast as first-line m aintenance therapy for patients with persistent asthma who are undertreated and remain symptomatic while taking short-acting <beta>(2)-agonists alone.