A comparison between quadrupole, double focusing and multicollector ICP-MSinstruments. Part I. Evaluation of total combined uncertainty for lead isotope ratio measurements

Citation
Jr. Encinar et al., A comparison between quadrupole, double focusing and multicollector ICP-MSinstruments. Part I. Evaluation of total combined uncertainty for lead isotope ratio measurements, J ANAL ATOM, 16(4), 2001, pp. 315-321
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
ISSN journal
02679477 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
315 - 321
Database
ISI
SICI code
0267-9477(2001)16:4<315:ACBQDF>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
A quadrupole-based instrument (HP-4500), a double focusing single collector instrument (Element) and a single focusing multicollector (IsoProbe) were all evaluated for the precise and accurate measurement of lead isotope rati os using Tl as internal isotope ratio standard. The isotope ratio accuracy was evaluated using NIST 981 Common Lead Isotope standard reference materia l and an enriched Pb-204 spike. Mass bias correction was performed using an exponential model in all the three instruments and equations for the evalu ation of the total combined uncertainty arising from the correction for the dead time and mass bias were developed. It was observed that, in the corre ction for mass bias, the uncertainty in the natural Tl ratio was the main s ource of uncertainty for the multicollector instrument while, for the quadr upole and double focusing single collector instruments, the measured isotop e ratio was the main source of uncertainty.