J. Pisonero et al., In-depth profile analysis by radiofrequency glow discharge optical emission spectrometry using pressure as variable parameter, J ANAL ATOM, 16(4), 2001, pp. 370-375
The analytical potential of radiofrequency glow discharge optical emission
spectroscopy (rf-GD-OES), keeping constant the delivered power and the dc-b
ias while leaving the pressure as a free parameter, is investigated for in-
depth profile analysis of conducting zinc-based coatings on steel. Results
are compared with those achieved with a direct current (dc)-GD-OES in its c
ommon in-depth profiling mode of operation (constant current intensity, mai
ntaining fixed the voltage at the expense of modifying the pressure). Under
the selected operation conditions (40 W of delivered power and -400 V of d
c-bias for rf-GD; -690 V and 11 mA for dc-GD), sputtering rates for differe
nt matrices (e.g., brass, stainless-steel, aluminium/silicon, nickel alloy)
were of the same order when comparing both discharges. Precisions achieved
in the measurement of sputtering rates for five replicates (burns) were be
tween +/-2.3 and +/- 10.8% for rf-GD and +/-1.9 and +/-7.2% for dc-GD. Reli
able values for the emission yields of each analyte emission line under stu
dy (Zn, Fe, Ni, Si, Cu, Al and Pb) in the different matrix reference sample
s selected were achieved. Better correlation coefficients of the plots of e
mission intensity versus the product of sputtering rate times and analyte c
oncentration in the case of dc-GD-OES were observed. The conversion from qu
alitative profiles (emission intensities versus time of acquisition) into q
uantitative profiles (concentration of the elements versus sputtered depth)
was attempted by rf-GD-OES as well. Good results were obtained using the s
elected operation conditions for materials such as electroplated ZnNi, galv
anneal and hot-dipped Zn. Such results were in agreement with those average
values obtained in a dc-GD-OES laboratory intercomparison project for the
same materials.