Hydrolysis of the tumor-inhibiting ruthenium[lll) complexes Hlm trans-[RnCl4(im)(2)] and Hlnd trans[RuCl4(ind)(2)] investigated by means of HPCE and HPLC-MS
A. Kung et al., Hydrolysis of the tumor-inhibiting ruthenium[lll) complexes Hlm trans-[RnCl4(im)(2)] and Hlnd trans[RuCl4(ind)(2)] investigated by means of HPCE and HPLC-MS, J BIOL I CH, 6(3), 2001, pp. 292-299
High performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE) as well as high performan
ce liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) have been applied to t
he separation, identification and quantification of the tumor-inhibiting ru
thenium compounds HIm trans-[RuCl4(im)(2)] (im=imidazole) and HInd trans-[R
uCl4(ind)(2)] (ind=indazole) and their hydrolysis products. The half-lives
for the hydrolytic decomposition of the Ru(III) compounds were determined b
y monitoring the relative decrease of the original complex anion under diff
erent conditions by means of capillary electrophoresis. The decomposition f
ollows pseudo-first-order kinetics. The rate constants in water at 25 degre
esC are 1.102+/-0.091x10(-5) s(-1) for HIm trans-[RuCl4(im)(2)] and 0.395+/
-0.014x10(-5) s(-1) for HInd trans-[RuCl4(ind)(2)]. About 8% of Him trans-[
RuCl4(im)(2)] but only about 2% of HInd trans-[RuCl4(ind)(2)] were hydrolyz
ed after 1 h at room temperature. Whereas the hydrolysis rate of the imidaz
ole complex is independent of the pH value, the indazole complex hydrolyzes
much faster at higher pH. The half-life of HInd trans-[RuCl4(ind)(2)] in p
hosphate buffer at pH 6.0 and 37 degreesC is 5.4 h, whereas it is less than
0.5 h at pH 7.4. In contrast to the imidazole complex, where no dependence
on the buffer system was observed, hydrolysis of the indazole complex is e
ven faster if a buffer containing hydrogen carbonate is used. The formation
of [RuCl2(H2O)(2)(im)(2)](+) could be demonstrated by HPLC-MS measurements
. In the case of the indazole complex, a release of the indazole ligands re
sults in the formation of [RuCl4(H2O)(2)](-).