P. Chevalier et al., Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety of two regimens of quinupristin/dalfopristin (Synercid (R)) in healthy volunteers, J CLIN PHAR, 41(4), 2001, pp. 404-414
Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D) is a novel streptogramin antibiotic for the
treatment of severe gram-positive infections. The purpose of this open, no
nrandomized, parallel-group, phase I trial was to evaluate Q/D pharmacokine
tics after single and repeated doses under the two different dosing regimen
s corresponding to the effective doses and to evaluate tolerability. Two gr
oups of 10 healthy volunteers received multiple I-hour intravenous infusion
s of 7,5 mg/kg Q/D either every 8 or 12 hours for 4 or 5 days, respectively
. Plasma concentrations of Q, D, and metabolites were determined using high
-performance liquid chromatography and selective microbiological assays. Th
e two regimens q8h and q12h lead to the same disposition profile after sing
le and repeated administration. Single-dose data confirmed the high plasma
clearances of Q and D (about 0.90 I/h/kg) obtained previously. Unchanged dr
ugs were the main components in plasma, with each of the three metabolites
representing about 20% (in terms of the AUC ratio) of the parent drugs. Com
parable steady-state concentrations were reached from day 2 of both regimen
s. A similar moderate increase in C-max and AUC (about 20%) of parent drugs
was observed between the first and lost day of treatment. This phenomenon,
which was also observed for the metabolites, was not expected considering
the short terminal disposition half-lives of the parent drugs and trough pl
asma concentrations of all components mostly below the limits of quantitati
on at steady state, whatever the dosing regimen. The clearances of parent d
rugs at steady state were about 20% lower as compared with that observed fo
llowing the first drug administration (statistically significant difference
). No trend suggesting a treatment effect on any laboratory parameter, vita
l signs, or electrocardiographic parameters was identified. However, 80% of
subjects reported venous adverse events probably related to treatment. sto
ol the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.