Venous thromboembolic disease: An observational study in medical-surgical intensive care unit patients

Citation
D. Cook et al., Venous thromboembolic disease: An observational study in medical-surgical intensive care unit patients, J CRIT CARE, 15(4), 2000, pp. 127-132
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
ISSN journal
08839441 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
127 - 132
Database
ISI
SICI code
0883-9441(200012)15:4<127:VTDAOS>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Purpose: Acute and chronic illness, immobility, and procedural and pharmaco logic interventions may predispose patients in the intensive care unit (ICU ) to venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease. The purpose of this study was to observe potential risk factors and diagnostic tests for VTE, and prophylaxi s against VTE in medical-surgical ICU patients. Materials and Methods: In a prospective observational study, 93 consecutive patients admitted to a mixed medical-surgical ICU were followed. We record ed demographics, admitting diagnoses, APACHE II score, VTE risk factors, an tithrombotic, anticoagulant and thrombolytic agents, diagnostic tests for d eep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE), and clinical outcom es. Results: Patients were 65.5 (15.5) years old with an APACHE II score of 21. 1 (9.0); 44 (47.3%) were female. Admission diagnoses were medical (58, 67.4 %) and surgical (35, 37.6%). The duration of ICU stay was 3 days (interquar tile range: 1,8.5 days) and the ICU mortality rate was 20.4% (19 of 93). We observed 8 VTE events among 5 of 93 patients (incidence 5.4% [0.8 to 10.0] ); 2 patients had DVT and PE before admission, 1 had DVT as an admitting di agnosis, 1 had DVT on day 2 and PE on day 3, and 1 had PE on day 2. Over 80 4 ICU patient-days, 2 of 5 ultrasound examinations diagnosed DVT and 2 of 3 ventilation-perfusion lung scans diagnosed PE. Of 64 patients in whom hepa rin was not contraindicated and who were not anticoagulated, subcutaneous h eparin prophylaxis was prescribed for 40 (62.5%) patients. ICU-acquired VTE risk factors were mechanical ventilation (odds ratio [OR] 1.56), immobilit y (OR 2.14), femoral venous catheter (OR 2.24), sedatives (OR 1.52), and pa ralytic drugs (OR 4.81), whereas VTE heparin prophylaxis (OR 0.08), aspirin (OR 0.42), and thromboembolic disease stockings (OR 0.63) were associated with a lower risk. Only warfarin (OR 0.07 P =.01) and intravenous heparin ( OR 0.04, P <.01) were associated with a significantly decreased risk of VTE . Conclusions: Several ICU-acquired risk factors for VTE were documented in t his medical-surgical ICU. VTE prophylaxis was underprescribed, and VTE diag nostic tests were infrequent. Further research is required to determine the incidence, predisposing factors, attributable morbidity, mortality, and co sts of VTE in medical-surgical ICU patients, the optimal diagnostic test st rategies, and the most cost-effective approaches of prophylaxis. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.