Scattering attenuation and intrinsic absorption using uniform and depth dependent model - Application to full seismogram envelope recorded in Northern Chile

Citation
M. Hoshiba et al., Scattering attenuation and intrinsic absorption using uniform and depth dependent model - Application to full seismogram envelope recorded in Northern Chile, J SEISMOL, 5(2), 2001, pp. 157-179
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY
ISSN journal
13834649 → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
157 - 179
Database
ISI
SICI code
1383-4649(200104)5:2<157:SAAIAU>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Two seismic wave attenuation factors, scattering attenuation Q(s)(-1) and i ntrinsic absorption Q(i)(-1) are measured using the Multiple Lapse Time Win dow (MLTW) analysis method for three different frequency bands, 1-2, 2-4, a nd 4-8 Hz. Data from 54 temporally deployed seismic stations located in nor thern Chile are used. This method compares time integrated seismic wave ene rgies with synthetic coda wave envelopes for a multiple isotropic scatterin g model. In the present analysis, the wave energy is assumed to decay with distance in proportion to1/GSF.exp(-(Q(s)(-1)+Q(i)(1)(-)).omega r/ v), wher e r, omega and v are the propagation distance, angular frequency and S wave velocity, respectively, and GSF is the geometrical spreading factor. When spatial uniformity of Q(s)(-1), Q(i)(-1) and v is assumed, i.e. GSF = 4 pi r(2), the estimates of the reciprocal of the extinction length, L-e(-1) (= (Q(s)(-1)+Q(i)(-1)).omega /v), are 0.017, 0.012 and 0.010 km(-1), and those of the seismic albedo, B-0 (= Q(s)(-1)/ (Q(s)(-1)+ Q(i)(-1))), are 0.48, 0 .40 and 0.34 for 1-2, 2-4 and 4-8 Hz, respectively, which indicates that sc attering attenuation is comparable to or smaller than intrinsic absorption. When we assume a depth dependent velocity structure, we also find that sca ttering attenuation is comparable to or smaller than intrinsic absorption. However, since the quantitative estimates of scattering attenuation depend on the assumed velocity structure (strength of velocity discontinuity and/o r Moho depth), it is important to consider differences in velocity structur e models when comparing attenuation estimates.