L. Rescorla et A. Alley, Validation of the language development survey (LDS): A parent report tool for identifying language delay in toddlers, J SPEECH L, 44(2), 2001, pp. 434-445
Two studies are reported demonstrating the reliability validity, and clinic
al utility of the Language Development Survey (LDS; L. Rescorla, 1989) as a
screening tool for the identification of expressive language delay in todd
lers. In Study 1,422 children (ages 24-26 months) were screened with the LD
S in an epidemiological survey. The LDS manifested excellent concurrent val
idity with a brief direct screening measure of expressive vocabulary. Using
the Rescorla (1989) Delay 3 cutoff of fewer than 50 words or no word combi
nations, 9.7% of the sample were language delayed (32 boys, 9 girls). In St
udy 2, 33 children identified as "at-risk" by the LDS Delay 3 cutoff and 33
typically developing children, matched on age, socioeconomic status, and g
ender, were seen for in-depth follow-up assessment approximately 3 weeks la
ter. The LDS test-retest reliability was .97. The LDS correlated highly wit
h Reynell Receptive and Expressive language Scale scores, Bayley Mental Dev
elopment Index, and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Composite. Sensitivity, spec
ificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value between t
he screening LDS and the follow-up Reynell Expressive language Scale were g
enerally impressive. Finally, the at-risk group scored significantly lower
than the LDS-identified typically developing group on all follow-up measure
s except the Child Behavior Checklist/2-3.