Measuring level of function in mentally Ill prison inmates: A preliminary study

Citation
Vl. Harris et D. Lovell, Measuring level of function in mentally Ill prison inmates: A preliminary study, J AM A PSYC, 29(1), 2001, pp. 68-74
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW
ISSN journal
10936793 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
68 - 74
Database
ISI
SICI code
1093-6793(2001)29:1<68:MLOFIM>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The need to portray accurately the level of functioning and severity of psy chiatric symptoms among mentally ill offenders (MIOs) is paramount from sev eral perspectives. The prison environment may cast aspersions on the reliab ility and validity of commonly used functional assessment tools. In additio n, these tools do not capture environment-specific areas that may be of int erest to the courts, clinicians. community mental health centers, and other correctional facilities. Male MIOs (n = 61) who had been treated for at le ast three months in a (male) Washington state prison mental health program were evaluated using clinical assessment tools, data abstraction from medic al records, and structured assessments from correctional officers. Clinical assessments occurred at their current site of incarceration. The semistruc tured clinical assessments had high construct validity and correlation for psychiatric symptoms and diagnosis. The ability of evaluators to determine accurately relative treatment compliance within the prison was low compared with the reports from correctional staff, particularly with respect to att endance at programs. In general, the officers did not recognize lack of pro gram participation and reclusive behavior as potential signs of mental illn ess. Despite a significant history of psychiatric symptoms severe enough to warrant inpatient treatment, 70 percent of the MIO individuals were functi oning reasonably well in a general population. A fully informed functional assessment of MIOs likely requires input from both clinicians and correctio nal officers.