In an appetitive context, honeybees (Apis mellifera) learn to associate odo
rs with a reward of sucrose solution. If an odor is presented immediately b
efore the sucrose, an elemental association is formed that enables the odor
to release the proboscis extension response (PER. Olfactory conditioning o
f PER was used to study whether, beyond elemental associations, honeybees a
re able to process configural associations. Bees were trained in a positive
and anegative patterning discrimination problem, in the first problem, sin
gle odorants were nonreinforced whereas the compound was reinforced. In the
second problem, single odorants were reinforced whereas the compound was n
onreinforced. We studied whether bees can solve these problems and whether
the ratio between the number of presentations of the reinforced stimuli and
the number of presentations of the nonreinforced stimuli affects discrimin
ation. Honey;bees differentiated reinforced and nonreinforced stimuli in po
sitive and negative patterning discriminations. They thus can process confi
gural associations. The variation of the ratio of reinforced to nonreinforc
ed stimuli modulated the amount of differentiation. The assignment of singu
lar codes to complex odor blends could be implemented at the neural level:
When bees are stimulated with odor mixtures, the activation patterns evoked
at the primary olfactory neuropile, the antennal lobe, may be combinations
of the single odorant responses that are not necessarily fully additive.