The present work compares the micromechanical approach and the continuum ap
proach for modeling microcracked continuum. The first approach considers a
distribution of microscopic cells including contacting lips (discontinuity
of matter), and the second approach considers a distribution of singularity
in a continuum (discontinuity of fields). The main difference in these two
methods is due to the choice of internal variables capturing the interstit
ial dissipation: torsion and curvature of the affine connection in the cont
inuum approach and jump of velocity and temperature across the cracks for t
he micromechanical approach. The continuum approach involves more details t
han the micromechanical approach due to the accounting for both the transla
tions and rotations of contacting lips.