'Autobiografiction': Problems with autobiographical fictions and fictionalautobiographies. Mark Rutherford's 'Autobiography' and 'Deliverance', and others

Authors
Citation
C. Swann, 'Autobiografiction': Problems with autobiographical fictions and fictionalautobiographies. Mark Rutherford's 'Autobiography' and 'Deliverance', and others, MOD LANG R, 96, 2001, pp. 21-37
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics
Journal title
MODERN LANGUAGE REVIEW
ISSN journal
00267937 → ACNP
Volume
96
Year of publication
2001
Part
1
Pages
21 - 37
Database
ISI
SICI code
0026-7937(200101)96:<21:'PWAFA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Starting from the epistemological and generic question as to how first read ers of William Hale White/Mark Rutherford's Autobiography and Deliverance c ould decide whether what they were reading was intended as autobiography or as fiction (however autobiographical), various possible factual and fictio nal earlier models for Rutherford are discussed (Cowper and W.D. Arnold as well as J.S. Mill and J.A. Froude). This is as a prelude to recontextualizi ng Rutherford alongside works by A.C. Benson, George Gissing and Edmund Gos se largely in the light provided by the revealingly titled and remarkably p erceptive 'Autobiografiction' (1906, Stephen Reynolds), which identifies a particularly modern form: a combination of 'what we may believe to be genui ne spiritual experiences' with 'a more or less fictitious but very credible autobiography.'