Ed. Louis et al., Family history information on essential tremor: Potential biases related to the source of the cases, MOVEMENT D, 16(2), 2001, pp. 320-324
The proportion of essential tremor (ET) cases that can be attributed to gen
etic factors is unknown: estimates range from 17-100%. One possible reason
for this variability is that clinic and community cases may differ with reg
ard to family history of ET. This is because clinic patients are self-selec
ted and represent as few as 0.5% of all ET cases. Our goal was to determine
whether ET cases ascertained from a clinic differed from those ascertained
from a community in terms of the family history information that they prov
ided. Subjects (57 clinic. 64 community) underwent a family history intervi
ew. Clinic cases were 4.73 times more likely to report an affected relative
than were community cases. We conclude that there was a substantial differ
ence between our clinic and community ET cases in terms of the information
they provided regarding their family history. Selection and reporting biase
s could have accounted for this difference. Because of these biases, the so
urce of the cases must be taken into consideration when investigators are t
rying to synthesize the widely variable results of studies that have estima
ted the genetic contribution to ET. (C) 2001 Movement Disorder Society.