R. Malik et A. Paraherakis, Reply to Fudin and Lembessis's critique of Malik and Paraherakis's commentary regarding the capacity of the unconscious, PERC MOT SK, 92(1), 2001, pp. 299-300
In an earlier paper, we had suggested that the research examining the capac
ity of the unconscious cannot be interpreted unambiguously to make the clai
m chat the unconscious is limited in scope. Fudin and Lembessis challenged
our conclusion, and we address their concerns.