Ra. Geiger et al., Balance and mobility following stroke: Effects of physical therapy interventions with and without biofeedback/forceplate training, PHYS THER, 81(4), 2001, pp. 995-1005
Background and Purpose. Visual biofeedback/forceplate systems are often use
d for treatment of balance disorders. In this study, the researchers invest
igated whether the addition of visual biofeedback/forceplate training could
enhance the effects of other physical therapy interventions on balance and
mobility following stroke. Subjects. The study included a sample of conven
ience of (13)under bar outpatients with hemiplegia who ranged in age from 3
0 to 77 years (X=60.4, SD=15.4) and were 15 to 538 days poststroke. Methods
. Subjects were assigned randomly to either an experimental group or a cont
rol group when the study began, and their cognitive and visual-perceptual s
kills were tested by a psychologist. Subjects were also assessed using the
Berg Balance Scale and the Timed "Up & Go" Test before and after 4 weeks of
physical therapy. Both groups received physical therapy interventions desi
gned to improve balance and mobility 2 to 3 times per week. The experimenta
l group trained on the NeuroCom Balance Master for 15 minutes of each 50-mi
nute treatment session. The control group received other physical therapy f
or 50 minutes. Results. Following intervention, both groups scored higher o
n the Berg Balance Scale and required less time to perform the Timed "Up &
Go" Test. These improvements corresponded to increased independence of bala
nce and mobility in the study population. However, a comparison of mean cha
nges revealed no differences between groups. Discussion and Conclusion. Alt
hough both groups demonstrated improvement following 4 weeks of physical th
erapy interventions, no additional effects were found in the group that rec
eived visual biofeedback/forceplate training combined with Other physical t
herapy.