Model parametrization in seismic tomography: a choice of consequence for the solution quality

Citation
E. Kissling et al., Model parametrization in seismic tomography: a choice of consequence for the solution quality, PHYS E PLAN, 123(2-4), 2001, pp. 89-101
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS
ISSN journal
00319201 → ACNP
Volume
123
Issue
2-4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
89 - 101
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9201(200104)123:2-4<89:MPISTA>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
To better assess quality of three-dimensional (3-D) tomographic images and to better define possible improvements to tomographic inversion procedures, one must consider not only data quality and numerical precision of forward and inverse solvers but also appropriateness of model parametrization and display of results. The quality of the forward solution, in particular, str ongly depends on parametrization of the velocity field and is of great impo rtance both for calculation of travel rimes and partial derivatives that ch aracterize the inverse problem. To achieve a quality in model parametrization appropriate to high-precision forward and inverse algorithms and to high-quality data, we propose a thre e-grid approach encompassing a seismic, a forward, and an inversion grid. T he seismic grid is set up in such a way that it may appropriately account f or the highest resolution capability (i.e. optimal data) in the data set an d that the 3-D velocity structure is adequately represented to the smallest resolvable detail apriori known to exist in real earth structure. Generall y, the seismic grid is of uneven grid spacing and it provides the basis for later display and interpretation. The numerical grid allows a numerically stable computation of travel times and partial derivatives. Its specificati ons are defined by the individual forward solver and it might vary for diff erent numerical techniques. The inversion grid is based on the seismic grid but must be large enough to guarantee uniform and fair resolution in most areas. For optimal data sets the inversion grid may eventually equal the se ismic grid but in reality, the spacing of this grid will depend on the illu mination qualities of our data set (ray sampling) and on the maximum matrix size we can invert for. The use of the three-grid approach in seismic tomography allows to adequate ly and evenly account for characteristics of forward and inverse solution a lgorithms, apriori knowledge of earth's structure, and resolution capabilit y of available data set. This results in possibly more accurate and certain ly in more reliable tomographic images since the inversion process may be w ell-tuned to the particular application and since the three-grid approach a llows better assessment of solution quality. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.