Longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic use in the hospital

Citation
D. Raveh et al., Longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic use in the hospital, QJM-MON J A, 94(3), 2001, pp. 141-152
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
QJM-MONTHLY JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS
ISSN journal
14602725 → ACNP
Volume
94
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
141 - 152
Database
ISI
SICI code
1460-2725(200103)94:3<141:LSOAUI>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
We evaluated antimicrobial use in our hospital by department, including ind ications for use, source of infections, use of the microbiology laboratory, and appropriateness of prescribing, in a prospective, comparative, non-int erventional study of all patients receiving antimicrobial agents. We exclud ed departments where antimicrobial use was negligible. The other 19 departm ents were followed for 3 (n=4) or 4 (n=15) months, including 2 consecutive months in the spring-summer and either 1 or 2 in the autumn-winter. Antimic robial therapy was followed from initiation, through possible adaptations, and possible change from intravenous to oral therapy, until discontinuation of treatment. Overall, 6376 antibiotics were given to 2306 patients. Of th e surveyed hospitalized patients, 62% +/- 22% received antibiotics, with a range of 4-100% per department. Antibiotics were prescribed for infections acquired in the community (3037 instances, 47%), in the hospital (2182, 34% ), in a nursing home (575, 9%), and for prophylaxis continued post-operativ ely (582, 9%). The most common indications for antimicrobial use were: resp iratory tract infection (1729, 27%), urinary tract infection (955, 15%), se psis (701, 11%), intra-abdominal infections (663, 10%), prophylaxis 582 (9% ), soft-tissue infection (572, 9%), and surgical site infection (319, 5%). Univariate indicators for appropriateness of treatment were: age, departmen t, site of infection, source of infection, antimicrobial drug and serum cre atinine (all p< 0.001). Forty-nine antimicrobials were prescribed in 279 co mbinations, 58% as single agent and 42% as drug combinations. Half of all a ntimicrobial use consisted of four agents: cefuroxime (19.1%), metronidazol e (11.3%) gentamicin (10.6%) and ampicillin (10.2%), which together account ed for 20% of expenditure on antibiotics. Although use of as many as 53% of antimicrobials (26/49) surveyed was restricted, use in this category accou nted for only 29% of all antimicrobial courses. Of 6376 antibiotic courses, 4101 (64%) were given intravenously and 2275 (36%) orally. Appropriateness of use of restricted drugs was lower (70%) than of unrestricted ones (84%, p<0.001). Of 24 571 defined daily doses (DDD) given orally, 4587 (19%) wer e restricted, compared to 7264 (34%) of 21 602 DDDs given intravenously (p< 0.001). Antibiotic treatment in our hospital appears to be substantial and increasing, justifying efforts to improve appropriateness of therapy and im prove clinical and financial results.