Context: Streptococcus pyogenes has recently re-emerged as a significant pa
thogen causing disease ranging from pharyngitis to lethal systemic infectio
n. Six hospital pharmacy employees were diagnosed as having streptococcal p
haryngitis during I week, and antibiotic prophylaxis was requested to halt
the outbreak.
Objective: Outbreak investigation.
Design: Review of initial cases and prospective evaluation of the remaining
pharmacy employees and the antigen detection test being used.
Setting: Pharmacy and occupational health department of a university hospit
al.
Population: Sixteen employees of the hospital pharmacy and 19 other employe
es of the hospital.
Results: The 6 pharmacy employees who had positive streptococcal antigen de
tection tests did not have symptoms suggesting streptococcal pharyngitis. O
f the 10 remaining pharmacy employees, none had a positive throat culture f
or S pyogenes. Specificity of the antigen detection test being used was 53%
(95% CI, 30%-75%) in prospective evaluation.
Conclusions: This was believed to represent a pseudoepidemic because none o
f the 6 cases had signs or symptoms typical of streptococcal pharyngitis, n
one of the remaining 10 pharmacy employees had positive throat cultures, an
d prospective evaluation found low specificity of the antigen detection tes
t. Whereas use of an accurate test in such a low prevalence setting could h
ave resulted in a higher percentage of results being false-positive, the lo
w specificity of the antigen detection test being used also contributed to
the pseudoepidemic.